I am working with the trial of helicon now. I did actually read that already before posting this. The finished shot is both at the top of the blog and below the others.Thanks. You can see how narrow the planes of focus are in each. Flatten the layers when photoshop is finished and prepare to be amazed. Then use Edit/Auto-blend layers/Stack images. Align the layers under Edit/Auto-align layers/Projection Auto. With PS, which is what I used here, select the photos in Bridge and go to Tools/Photoshop/Load files into Photoshop layers. These programs do a reasonable job and prices vary from free to $149. Open them in PhotoAcute, Helicon Focus, Picolay or Zerene. And of course, make sure the exposures are all the same, the camera and zoom don’t move and the wind isn’t blowingĪfter downloading the images. ![]() Make sure all the photos are shot at the same aperture otherwise things will get really screwed up. This can take two to however many shots, but usually 3-5 will suffice. First focus on what’s closest to the camera, then focus on something a little further back, focus farther still and finally take a shot of the most distant part of the composition. Whether you’re shooting a landscape with a close foreground and distant mountains or a flower, simply take a series of exposures with varying planes of focus. It has to be done on a tripod and using manual focus. So what if I could use my sharpest aperture while keeping everything from front to back in focus? What if you can do that on the tiniest of subjects, in this case, the center of an iris.Įnter Focus Stacking. My 28-300 Nikon is sharpest between f9 and f11 Plus, every lens has a sweet spot where it’s sharpest. Sure, you can use the smallest apertures, but the sharpness gets degraded as you close down. Not to mention weighing significantly less.īut still, the problem of keeping things in focus from front to back is still there. And I can’t laud enough praise on today’s cameras that give me far greater ease of use along with extremely high quality. Then of course, they had to make their shifts and tilts, re-compose, check the focus, etc. Well, what you didn’t see is the person beneath the cloth first composing the faint upside down and backwards image on the rear ground glass and then using a magnifying loupe to carefully inspect the focus. ![]() You’ve seen the caricature of someone behind a big camera looking through the ground glass beneath a black cloth. They even started a movement called Group f64. Sure the quality from a 4×5 inch piece of film was incredible, but hiking miles into the best spot was at best, a labor of love.Īnsel Adams, the great master, did it as did so many other great artists even up until today. Lugging around a heavy 4×5 camera, the film holders and a big heavy tripod, not to mention the other accouterments, like light meter, dark cloth, loupe, lenses etc. Once again, I say an emphatic Hallelujah! for digital photography. The closer you get, the narrow it becomes, often just millimeters.Ī 4×5’s ability to change the perspective by using swings, tilts and shifts of the front and rear standard in conjunction with f32, 45 or even f64, allowed photographers to keep everything in focus from a subject inches from the lens to mountains in the distance. With macro photography, the problem is multiplied because even at the smallest apertures, the plane of focus is so very narrow. ![]() In the past, this required either using the smallest aperture possible like f22 on SLR’s or getting out the big 4×5 camera. One of the biggest challenges in photography has always been maintaining sharp focus from the foreground to the background in an image.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |